top of page

Out-of-County Land You Never Visit: The Hidden Costs of Holding vs. Selling to a Direct Buyer

  • Writer: Joshua Kagan
    Joshua Kagan
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • 3 min read

This blog explores the real financial and emotional trade-offs of keeping out-of-county land you rarely (or never) use versus selling directly to a reputable land buyer. It is written to help owners make a clear, informed decision without pressure.​

Key Takeaways

  • Out-of-county land quietly costs more than most owners realize once you add taxes, maintenance risks, legal exposure, and mental overhead.​

  • Selling to a direct land buyer can trade long-term uncertainty and drip expenses for speed, simplicity, and a defined outcome.​

  • The “right” choice depends on your goals, timeline, and whether the land is an asset you plan to use or a liability you’re managing from a distance.​

What “Out-of-County” Really Means for Owners

When you own land in a different county or state, you are responsible for a property you cannot easily monitor, visit, or manage. That distance magnifies small issues—like a missed tax bill or an unnoticed code violation—into bigger problems because you are not physically there to catch them early.​

Many owners never planned to own this land long-term; they inherited it, bought it on impulse, or kept it “just in case,” without a clear strategy. Over time, the property quietly drifts from “potential asset” toward “nagging obligation,” especially when life gets busier and priorities change.​

The Hidden Costs of Holding Out-of-County Land

The obvious cost is property taxes, but that is only the beginning. Depending on the county, you may also have association dues, road maintenance assessments, or special district fees that show up sporadically and are easy to miss when you live far away.​

There is also legal exposure: if someone illegally dumps trash, uses the land, or gets injured there, the owner—not the county—is ultimately responsible. Even if nothing dramatic happens, you still spend mental energy tracking mail, notices, and due dates for a property you rarely benefit from.​

When Holding Might Still Make Sense

There are situations where holding the property is reasonable, even if you rarely visit. If the land has a clear, realistic future use—planned retirement build, family cabin with a specific timeline, or known development path supported by zoning and infrastructure—it may still be an intentional investment, not a loose end.​

Holding also makes more sense when taxes and carrying costs are low relative to your income, and the land fits a bigger wealth or estate strategy you actively review. In those cases, documenting your plan and communicating it with heirs reduces the risk that the land becomes a confusing burden later.​

The Case for Selling to a Direct Buyer

A direct land buyer specializes in purchasing properties as-is, with no showings, repairs, or listings, and typically covers most or all standard closing costs. Instead of months of uncertainty, you get a clear offer, a simple contract, and a defined closing timeline, often measured in weeks.​

For out-of-county owners, this eliminates travel, back-and-forth with agents, and the need to coordinate local vendors to clean or prepare the property. It converts a slow drip of future obligations into one decision and one transaction, freeing up cash and mental space.​

How Direct Buyers Typically Structure Offers

Most reputable buyers start with county data: recent sales, assessed values, access, topography, and local demand. They then discount for risk and holding costs on their side, since they are taking on the uncertainty of resale, marketing, and time on market after closing.​


This means an investor offer is almost never top-of-market retail pricing, but it is designed to be fair in exchange for speed, certainty, and convenience. When you factor in agent commissions, months of waiting, and ongoing taxes, the “discount” often looks more like a trade: equity for time and simplicity.​

Questions to Ask Any Direct Buyer

Before deciding, ask any buyer:

  • Who are you, and how long have you been buying land?

  • Will I owe anything at closing, or do you cover all standard fees?

  • How do you handle back taxes or liens, if there are any?

  • What is the exact timeline from signed agreement to closing?

A legitimate buyer will answer clearly, provide a written purchase agreement you can review, and encourage you to ask questions or consult others if you are unsure. Vague responses, pressure tactics, or refusal to put terms in writing are all signals to slow down or walk away.​​

Deciding: Keep It or Let It Go?

A simple way to decide is to look five to ten years ahead and ask: “If nothing changes, am I still glad I kept this land?” If the honest answer is no—and you do not have a concrete plan for using or developing it—then holding is probably just delaying an inevitable decision.​

Selling to a direct buyer is often the best fit for owners who value clarity, speed, and not having to think about an out-of-county property ever again. If you still feel torn, it is reasonable to get multiple opinions, compare offers, and choose the path that best matches your long-term priorities, not short-term emotion.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page